Condition Monitoring and Security in the Cloud

‘The Cloud’ refers to software, services and data that are stored on the internet.  However, this data is not just stored in a random location; it will be located on a group of computers operated by a service provider. Typically it will be Microsoft, Amazon, or Google, but other providers are available.  These companies have vast arrays of computer servers located in Data Centres around the world, and your data will be kept in one or more of these data centres – and generally restricted to one region (for example, the US or EU) upon request.

Cloud technology can provide a huge amount of benefit when used and implemented correctly. It can greatly reduce the risk of data loss because of how cloud providers offer managed services to handle backups and failovers systems. 

For a condition monitoring platform using the cloud, it is essential that sensor data reaches the cloud using a secure method. Gateways, or base stations, that send vital condition monitoring data to the cloud do so using secure network protocols and encryption. Data sent using SSH, IPsec, PGP or TLS/SSL with encryptions such as AES, 3DES or RSA are industry standard. This makes the connection very robust helping to keep your data safe on the internet. Once the data reaches the cloud, it is good practice to further encrypt the data whilst being held in the database (encrypted at rest) using the same or similar methods highlighted above.

Using an internet connection and browser, an authorised user will have access to the data from anywhere in the world. User login credentials require a token (access to the encrypted data at rest) to safely and securely view valuable condition monitoring data.

Other technologies, such as machine learning, can also utilise the superior computing power that comes from the cloud, giving automated intelligence to any machine that is monitored.

Some scenarios will not be suitable for cloud computing, such as sites that do not have an internet connection, or require an offline system.  However, many typical systems can benefit from adopting a cloud-based condition monitoring platform and strategy.

David Procter, Systems Development Manager, Sensoteq

What to consider when choosing a wireless condition monitoring system

As wireless sensor are starting to become mainstream in the condition monitoring world, there are now many more choices to consider when selecting a system to fit your needs.  This tip aims to look at the key features that will impact your decision.  When purchasing your next wireless system, quiz your supplier using the information below.

Data Captured

Not all wireless sensors are created equal. Some will only capture an OA, or Overall Value, which is a single number indicative of the amount of vibration measured at the sensor.  OA is useful for detecting certain types of faults, but it will not assist in diagnosing the problem, or inform the user of how severe the potential issue is.

The good news is that there are a lot of sensors on the market that capture a full time waveform, TWF.  This waveform can be transformed into a spectrum revealing the energy associated with the underlying frequencies.  Using both a TWF and Spectrum is a reliable tool for diagnosing faults. 

One step better is a sensor that will capture both an OA value regularly, and a TWF periodically – ensuring both a timely and informative strategy.


This is the maximum frequency your sensor will capture, higher values allow for detecting faults on higher speed machines, or on very low speed machines (providing the sample window is sufficient).  The general rule of thumb is Fmax = 70 x Running Speed. As the vast majority of wireless sensors are tri-axial, you should ensure you are aware of the Fmax for each axis, as you may only need a high Fmax reading in one axis.

Installation and Maintenance

Ease of installation is a huge area for wireless sensors.  Does the sensor and gateway come pre-linked? How do you connect a new sensor to a gateway? Can you easily swap a sensor should one need replaced? Ask your supplier to show you a typical installation so you understand the time involved.

Wireless Technology & Range

There are numerous wireless technologies available, but make sure you are aware of the pros and cons of each before choosing your supplier.  WiFi and Bluetooth (both 2.4GHz) are very common and easy for most to understand, but their range can be limited when used in an industrial environment, furthermore, some factories control their entire plant using 2.4GHz and will simply not allow the addition of more transmitters on that frequency. 

Other technologies such as LoRa and ISM will utilise sub-1GHz bands and will not interfere with existing equipment. They also benefit from better propagation through certain materials due to their lower frequency, meaning better range for similar battery life – with less existing equipment on this band, it will trouble IT teams much less.


There’s no point having a wireless sensor if it’s powered via cables – thus most, if not all, wireless sensors are battery powered.  You will find two key options, non-replaceable and replaceable. 

Non-replaceable batteries will benefit when it comes to ingress protection and intrinsic safety. As the sensor will not be user serviceable, it greatly increases robustness.

Replaceable batteries increase the useable life of the sensor – but be aware of misleading claims from manufacturers quoted battery life, as it can typically only be achieved when the sensor is in a low power state and limited use mode – ask your sensor supplier for the true battery life for your given application. The more times you have to replace a battery, the greater cost to you, mostly for the time it takes to replace (on average $100 per sensor), so higher battery life is better, even for replaceable battery.

David Proctor, Global Systems Data Specialist at Sensoteq